- Introduction
Although American societies remained completely isolated from
other civilizations during the postclassical period, they
continued to display diversity and sophistication based on
classical American foundations. By 1500, the Americas were
typified by a high population in many places. The greater
American civilizations developed advanced agricultural
systems, urbanization, social and economic diversity, and
centralized political institutions.
- Postclassic Mesoamerica, 1000-1500 C.E.
- Introduction
The most important of the Mesoamerican civilizations were
those of the Toltecs and Aztecs. The Toltecs migrated into
central Mexico from the north and adopted a militaristic
ethic from sedentary peoples already living in the area.
- The Toltec Heritage
From the establishment of their capital at Tula in 968, the
Toltecs were able to establish a significant empire in
central Mexico and the Yucatan. Some later Maya rulers were
clearly under Toltec influence. Toltec influence may have
extended as far north as the American Southwest, where some
evidence of their trade network can be found. There is less
agreement about the possibility of Toltec influence in the
Mississippian culture of the Ohio River valley.
- The Aztec Rise to Power
Nomadic invaders destroyed the Toltec capital of Tula around
1150. Thereafter the center of Mesoamerican power shifted to
the region surrounding a group of lakes in the valley of
Mexico. Various groups contested for supremacy in the
valley. Among these groups were the Aztecs, who probably
migrated into the valley around 1325 following the fall of
the Toltec empire. Three city-states Azcapotzalco, Texcoco,
and Culhuacan dominated the lakesides of the valley.
Eventually the Aztecs, after a period of serving as
mercenaries, settled on an island in Lake Texcoco and
established their capital of Tenochtitlan. Through a series
of alliances with and against the other city-states, the
Aztecs were able to emerge as an independent power. By 1434
the Aztecs were the most powerful partners in a triple
alliance linking Tenochtitlan, Texcoco, and Tlacopan.
- The Aztec Social Contract
The series of wars leading to Aztec dominance caused social
changes. The Aztec ruler, supported by a nobility, became
vastly more powerful. Eventually Aztec dominance spread to
encompass most of central Mexico. Social stratification
became pronounced. The architect of social change was
Tlacaelel, a prime minister for three rulers. The use of
human sacrifice as part of Aztec ritual was expanded under
his influence. Some areas were purposely left independent in
order to make wars possible. The intent of the wars was to
secure captives for human sacrifice.
- Religion and the Ideology of Conquest
The Aztecs venerated the traditional pantheon of Mesoamerican
gods. Yearly festivals and complex rituals supported the
numerous deities. Gods were organized into the major cults
of fertility, creation, and warfare. The last included
rituals of human sacrifice and became the cult of the state.
The central deity of the cult of the state was
Huitzilopochtli. Under both the Toltecs and Aztecs,
frequency and scale of human sacrifice increased. Although
human sacrifice dominated Aztec religion, worship also
concerned the afterlife, creation myths, and a cyclical view
of history based on a distinctive calendar system.
- Tenochtitlan: The Foundation of Heaven
The Aztecs considered their capital city a sacred space. The city became a great metropolis and the heart of an empire. The nearby market town, Tlatelolco, was also impressive. Tenochtitlan, an island-city with canals, was divided into wardseach controlled by a calpulli, or kin group.
- Feeding the People: The Economy of the Empire
To feed their enormous population, the Aztecs constructed a
tribute system from conquered peoples. In addition, the
Aztecs developed an intensive form of agriculture utilizing
floating beds and artificial islands, or chinampas. Yields
from chinampa agriculture were high. In each Aztec
community, clans distributed available land for cultivation.
Some land was reserved for the nobility and worked by slaves.
A merchant class operated the markets that provided for the
exchange of food and luxuries. The state actually controlled
all trade and managed the collection and redistribution of
tribute.
- Aztec Society in Transition
- Introduction
Aztec society became increasingly hierarchical. Eventually
the growing population could not be sustained on the basis of
the tribute system.
- Widening Social Gulf
The basic social unit of Aztec society was the calpulli, or
clan. By the sixteenth century, there were about twenty
major clans. These groups controlled land distribution,
labor, and military service. Beyond the clan structure of
Aztec society, a nobility, the pipiltin, developed from elite
families within the calpulli. The nobility held private land
and political office within the empire. Nobles controlled
the priesthood and military, which was in turn divided into
ranks depending on an individual's success in taking
captives. The nobility was closely associated with the
ritual of human sacrifice.
As the Aztec empire grew, the gulf between commoners and the
nobility expanded. As the nobility separated from the
calpulli, a class of semi-free laborers with low
social status emerged to work on
noble estates. . Another intermediate group consisted of
scribes, artisans, and healers. Merchants comprised a
separate calpulli. By the sixteenth century, it is possible
to see some conflict between the calpulli of commoners and
the nobles.
- Overcoming Technological Constraints
Aztec women provided some agricultural labor, but their
primary responsibility was the household. Although
politically subordinate, Aztec women did have recognized
legal rights. Lack of machines for grinding forced Aztec
women to spend a disproportionate amount of time grinding
maize into flour. Population density within the Aztec empire
appears to have been high.
- A Tribute Empire
A speaker chosen from among the nobility ruled each Aztec
city-state. The speaker of Tenochtitlan, the capital, was
the emperor. A powerful prime minister, often chosen from
the same family, assisted the emperor. As the empire
matured, the position of the emperor and the central
government became more powerful and the cult of the military
became the cult of the state. The empire never developed
strong ties to local administration, which often remained in
the hands of local rulers. City-states were left relatively
free to govern their subjects, so long as they recognized the
Aztec rulers and paid tribute. There were many rebellions
against Aztec rule. In the long run, the rise of the
nobility and the continued reign of terror contributed to the
downfall of the Aztec empire.
- Twantinsuyu: World of the Incas
- Introduction
The establishment of the Inca empire was contemporary with
the Aztec expansion in Mesoamerica. The Incas built on the
cultural traditions of earlier Andean societies, but provided
a greater degree of political and cultural centralization.
Following the decline of the "horizon" states of Tihuanaco
and Huari around 1000 C.E., many regional political units
continued to survive. The most important of these regional
cultures was the coastal kingdom of Chimor, which flourished
between 900 and 1465.
- The Inca Rise to Power
While Chimor controlled the coast, several clans, or ayllus,
contested for supremacy in the Andean highlands. The most
successful group of ten clans controlled a region near Cuzco.
By 1438 these clans, under the leadership of their ruler, or Inca, Pachacuti,
were able to establish their government over much of the
highland region. Inca Topac Yupanqui defeated Chimor. By
1527 the Inca empire stretched from what is now Colombia to
Chile in the Andean region.
- Conquest and Religion
One of the chief incentives to continued expansion was the
Inca practice of split inheritance. Following the death of a
leader, political power passed to his successor, but all
movable wealth and real property was retained to support the
cult of the dead Inca's mummy. Each new Inca thus had to
expand his territory to increase his wealth and provide for
his afterlife. The Incas regarded the sun as the chief deity
and identified the ruler as the sun's earthly representative.
In addition to the sun, other major deities as well as local
gods continued to be worshiped. Inca religion was strongly
animistic. Prayers and rituals were offered to holy shrines,
or huacas.
- The Techniques of Inca Imperial Rule
The capital of the Inca empire was Cuzco, from where the
Incas ruled as semi-divine figures. The empire was divided
into four major provinces, each of which was subdivided into
local administrative units. Local rulers were often
permitted to retain power in return for securing tribute for
the Incas. Loyalty was secured by the practice of
colonization, in which loyal groups were imported into newly
conquered territories or disaffected populations were
forcibly moved to new regions. Roads served to secure
communications throughout the empire.
The Inca state engendered loyalty by its management of a
complex system of collection and redistribution, state
enhancement of the infrastructure, and opportunity for
sharing in the spoils of conquest. Tribute was largely
collected through labor on state lands and building projects.
Local ayllus controlled land distribution and labor
requisitions in each community. Property passed through both
the male and female line in Inca social hierarchies, but
women did not commonly serve as heads of ayllus during the
Inca period. Some women were forced into concubinage of the
royal family or dedicated to various temples. Over the heads
of the ayllus were members of the Inca nobility. Those
members of the nobility related to the royal family enjoyed
highest status. Unlike Mesoamerica, the Inca empire lacked a
distinct merchant class. Although the Inca empire functioned
efficiently for nearly a century, a system of royal multiple marriages
eventually produced civil strife in the sixteenth century.
- Inca Cultural Achievements
The Inca were particularly proficient metallurgists. Like
the peoples of Mesoamerica, the Inca did not develop the
wheel. The Incas were relatively unique in that they lacked
a system of writing. They did use quipus, knotted strings,
to record information. Monumental architecture and road
building were highly developed among the Andean people.
- Comparing Incas and Aztecs
Both the Incas and the Aztecs represented the imperial stage
of political development. Both states relied on intensive
agricultural systems to support massive populations and
managed redistribution networks to circulate necessities and
luxuries. In both regions, the nobility served as the
administrative bureaucracy. Both empires allowed the
continued existence of local governments subject to the
payment of tribute, the collection and redistribution of
which provided the primary source of trade. Trade and
markets were far more developed among the Aztecs than the
Incas.
Basic similarities existed in religious beliefs, cosmology,
and social structure. Whether by direct contact or parallel
development, Indian societies in the Americas shared many
common traits.
- The Other Indians
- Introduction
Aside from the imperial cultures of Mesoamerica and the
Andes, the Americas were populated by numerous other Indian
groups organized at various levels of social complexity.
- How Many Indians?
Population density in the Americas prior to European contact
was relatively high. Mesoamerica and the Andes supported the
most dense population concentrations. The Indian population
of the Americas may have been roughly the same as that for
contemporary Europe.
- Differing Cultural Patterns
Northern South America and parts of Central America shared
important cultural traits with the imperial regions.
Chiefdoms based on sedentary agriculture existed in the areas
of modern Colombia, along the Amazon, and on some islands in
the Caribbean. In the North American woodlands, agricultural
societies supplemented their food supply with hunting and
gathering. There was less social stratification and economic
specialization among these groups. Full-fledged nomadic
pastoralists were lacking in the Americas prior to European
contact.
In North America there was remarkable cultural diversity,
with over 200 language groups spoken by 1500. North American
societies varied from the hierarchical and agricultural
groups in the Southeast and Southwest to less complex social
units of hunters and gatherers. With the exception of the
imperial states of Mesoamerica and the Andes, most Indian
groups remained strongly kin-based with property held
communally or by clan.
- Conclusion: American Indian Diversity in
World Context
By the end of the fifteenth century, two militaristic empires
were established in Mesoamerica and the Andes. These empires
proved vulnerable to internal disruption and technologically
inferior to Eurasian civilizations. Elsewhere in the
Americas, other Indian groups demonstrated enormous diversity
in social organization and economic development.